Maritime
Contact Maritime
Business Hours:
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., M-F
Maritime Division
687 Switzer Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 686-6236
FAX: (619) 686-8055
Maritime Operations
620 Switzer Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 686-6340
FAX: (619) 234-3965
Maritime Properties & Facilities
645 Switzer Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 725-6007
FAX: (619) 686-6215
Trade Development
601 Switzer Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 686-6300
FAX: (619) 686-7288
Tenth Ave Marine Terminal
623 Switzer Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 686-6346
FAX: (619) 686-6354
Cruise Ship Terminal
1140 N. Harbor Drive
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 683-8966
FAX: (619) 683-8968
National City Terminal
1400 W.Bay Marine Dr.
National City 91950
Phone: (619) 683-8963
FAX: (619) 683-8964
US Customs and
Border Protection
(619) 685-4300
November 4th Ballot Measure
The Board of Port Commissioners has filed a lawsuit to stop a November 4 ballot measure that would amend the San Diego Unified Port District's master plan to allow hotels, restaurants and possibly a sports stadium at the Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal cargo facility. The Board unanimously agreed that the ballot measure threatens the viability of the terminal by allowing non-maritime uses.
- The Port of San Diego Marine Freight Preservation and Bayfront Redevelopment Initiative
- Full text of Port of San Diego lawsuit
- Working Waterfront Photo Gallery
- Environmental Commitment
- Economic Impact of U.S. Ports
- Port of San Diego Maritime Business Plan
- Commonly Asked Questions
- Economic and Fiscal Impact of Port Tidelands
To learn more about the businesses and industry on the waterfront, please visit the Working Waterfront Group website.
The California Report Discusses "Developers in San Diego Bay"
(Excerpt) San Diego's Port District plans to file suit against developers who want to build hotels and shops over the docks of San Diego Bay. The region is ideal for cargo ships unloading freight from overseas. It's also prime real estate for developers, and over the years, high rise hotels and a convention center have sprung up along the waterfront.
- Original story (The California Report)
The California Report (KQED) Developers in San Diego Bay
Business at Port’s Marine Terminals Shows no Signs of Slowing Down
Comments from Port Chair Michael Bixler
Recently we’ve been reading in the newspapers and watching on the local television news about an idea to double deck the Port of San Diego’s Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal so that it could be used for multiple functions. Those supporting the idea believe that the terminal could host a sporting event for the public while the Port conducts its normal maritime activity. There’s a misconception floating around that the Port’s maritime activity is experiencing a lull and that the Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal could be put to better use.
Equipment for new Otay Mesa Power Plant is Unloaded at Port of San Diego
Heavy equipment for a new power plant in Otay Mesa was off-loaded today at the Port of San Diego’s Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal. Shipping company Chipolbrok America Inc. transported the 24 modules, some weighing 173 metric tons, from Korea aboard the ocean carrier Wladyslaw Orkan. The Port’s new business was generated during a recent trade mission to Asia by Port of San Diego officials. “This underscores the importance of forging strong relationships with customers and prospective customers in the international market,” said Port Commissioner Sylvia Rios, who met with Chipolbrok representatives in Shanghai, China, last year while she was Chairman of the Board of Port Commissioners.
Port Board Opposes Proposed Ballot Initiative
The Board of Port Commissioners has voted unanimously to oppose a proposed ballot initiative that seeks to amend the San Diego Unified Port District's master plan to allow hotels, restaurants and possibly a sports stadium at the Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal cargo facility. The Board unanimously agreed that the initiative threatens the viability of the terminal by allowing non-maritime uses.
"I'm one thousand percent opposed to this initiative," Commissioner Stephen Cushman said.
The Board, along with its outside legal counsel, questioned the legality of the initiative while raising a concern that the proposed changes could compromise security at the Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal.
